Networking: it can do a mind good

Until last week, I’d forgotten how energizing good networking can be.

I’m an introvert. Sometimes, I find socializing to be extremely mentally and physically draining. I work from home, and I know it’s important for me to get out of the house and talk to a live person every now and then. But lately, I just haven’t found the motivation.

I think my lack of motivation stems partly from having attended one too many bad networking sessions – sessions that initially held promise, but turned bad (for me) because of negative interactions or a lack of positive interactions.

So, it is with much gratitude that I thank the ladies of Palo Alto AWIS for organizing a fantastic career panel event last week! You’ve reminded me how fun and energizing a networking event can be.

This machine would make networking much easier! (Richard-G/Flickr)

I had signed up to be a volunteer at the event – being a self-branded “alternative” careers evangelist, I was excited about helping to support an event that would present different career options for scientists. I attended many similar events when I was contemplating my own career transition, and they are extremely helpful.

I met some great people, listened to several interesting career stories, and came away feeling positive and enthusiastic.

As it turns out, I will be doing a write-up of the event for the Palo Alto AWIS newsletter. During the dinner/networking part of the evening, I happened to mention to Chapter President Ashley Fouts that I’m a science writer. Next thing I knew, I had grabbed my laptop from my car and was poking around the auditorium looking for an electrical outlet. (Attendees: Yes, that was me in the second row, furiously typing during the panel discussion. There was a reason for those copious notes!) Exciting! I’m more than happy to volunteer my services for spreading the word about “alternative” science careers! Perhaps they won’t mind me cross-posting the write-up here…?

Networking can be tricky sometimes – being selective with networking events has helped me to find events that end up being good and to avoid the ones that end up being bad (good and bad of course being subjectively defined). What I enjoy most about networking (and what is likely to make an event good for me) is meeting science-minded people (not necessarily scientists!) and/or people who are interested in communication or education. In other words, I want to meet people with whom I have something in common. (Go figure.) And because I go to networking events with the goal of connecting with people and exchanging ideas, I want to know that there are people there who are actually interested in discussion (and not just handing out their business cards).

Although I am more of a generalist these days as compared to when I was a graduate student studying yeast cell polarity, I have found (to my surprise but probably to no one else’s) that I am still very specialized compared to the average professional.

It’s not that I mind meeting or talking to people with different interests or careers – sometimes it’s great fun (and very eye-opening) to meet someone who’s doing something completely different from me! But in some cases, the result can be a severe lack of connection, which can lead to an increasing sense of what am I doing here?

Last week’s Palo Alto AWIS event was nearly ideal for me in terms of finding like-minded people: scientists thinking about and discussing “alternative” careers. I was so happy just listening to the women of the panel describe their respective careers and transitions out of the lab. I had to restrain myself from jumping up and shouting Amen! at certain points.

The only negative thing about the event? I’m a bit out of practice when it comes to networking. Perhaps I should consider attending more random networking events just to keep up the “schmoozing” skills and avoid sounding too much like Chester in this classic Looney Tunes cartoon.

#arseniclife, peer review, and the scientific process

I set out this morning to write down some thoughts about the arsenic-containing bacteria study (aka #arseniclife). Three hours later, I realized I was completely in over my head. What follows are lots of links and some musings of my own.

I wasn’t even attempting to delve into the science. (Being a yeast cell biologist by training, this is a bit outside my area of expertise.) Rather, I was interested in the controversy surrounding this paper and what we might be able to learn from it about the scientific process.

Turns out there is quite a lot to mull over.

The study was published online in Science in December and stirred up a great deal of controversy, which wasn’t helped by a provocative press release from NASA that included the phrase “evidence for extraterrestrial life”. Science published online today eight Technical Comments critiquing the arsenic bacteria study, as well as a formal response from the authors, Felisa Wolfe-Simon and colleagues.

[Note 06/03/2011: The Technical Comments and authors’ response are no longer available on Science Express, because they are published in the today’s issue of Science, along with the final version of the arsenic bacteria paper. The links I had included here for the paper take you to the version that was published online. Here’s a link to the final full text of the article, which appears to be freely available, at least for now.]

Continue reading

Writing support

Sometimes we all need a little support.

I started seeing the #madwriting hashtag on Twitter… maybe a couple days ago? I had a suspicion of what it might be, but was too shy to ask. Luckily, @nparmalee started a Posterous for #madwriting and expounded there on what it represented for her, how it worked, etc.

She mentions that #madwriting for her at the moment is her PhD thesis. (Best of luck @nparmalee!)

That brought to my mind an online support network in which I was briefly active during the last stages of my thesis writing. (I wrote my dissertation in the summer of 2007, before I had joined Facebook or Twitter.) It was a forum/message board (remember those?) called PhinisheD.

Continue reading

Human chromosomes

One of the best/worst things about my job is that I sometimes get/have to come up with suitable images to accompany a blog post or an article that I’m writing. As is the case with most searches, I don’t always find exactly what I was looking for. Sometimes though I find something I wasn’t looking for.

For a recent project, I was perusing Google Images* in search of a good karyotype image. I was working on an article about aneuploidy, so I was hoping to come across a usable image depicting the karyotype of an extremely aneuploid tumor cell.

In my perusals, I came across this great concept photo from photographer Jessica Lobdell – she posed as the chromosomes in a typical karyotype image! I’ve always thought chromosomes could look quite jovial. She’s captured that spirit perfectly in her poses.

Below are Jessica’s photo and (after the jump) an image of a normal human male karyotype for comparison.

Photo by Jessica Lobdell. Click the photo to go to her site.

Continue reading

Turns out I’ve been a writer all along

I have never thought of myself as a writer.

‘Writing’ has always been something I associated with English class. It was in English that we learned the mechanics of commas and the structure of essays. ‘Writers’ were, in my mind, literary types – people who wrote novels and composed poetry.

I have always been a science nerd. Ever since the fourth grade, fascinated with my teacher’s science demos – swinging buckets of water and dissections of various organs and organisms – I had identified with science.

But as it turns out, I’ve been a writer all along. Continue reading